about our funding
BrainStorm Neuroscience Pitch Competition is the vehicle used by the Mind Science Foundation to fund early-career researchers teamed with senior primary investigators, working on pilot studies to help them obtain grants for further research, with an additional strategic goal designed to incentivize the building of skills in translating complex neuroscience for a general audience.
We believe providing opportunities for young scientists to fund their work, and hone their communications skills is critical to the advancement of science and a powerful counterweight to anti-science sentiment prevalent in some sectors.
BrainStorm is also a powerful educational opportunity for our audience of lay people as they learn – directly from researchers during their pitches – the intricacies of brain function, and how their research projects can harness the power of the brain to improve treatment of neurological deficits as well as optimize the human experience.
Specifically, Mind Science seeks to fund research that will lead to significant advancements in the science of consciousness and/or improvements in the health and well-being of humankind. Fields of inquiry include, but are not limited to: neuroscience, cognitive science, psychology, resiliency, physics, philosophy, biology, artificial intelligence, sleep and dream research, creativity, education, neuro-ethics, and experiential/subjective studies.
PLEASE NOTE: As the future of large gatherings is still uncertain, out of concern for the health and safety of participants and attendees, the live Competition event has now been moved to an ONLINE EVENT. More details will be provided as they become available.
For further information on funding opportunities, please contact Mindy Cohen at firstname.lastname@example.org.
research funding opportunities
apply for funding
About Mind Science
Our founder, Texas oilman and philanthropist Tom Slick, Jr., was a man of science and an enthusiastic proponent of world peace. He believed the fruit of basic research in physical science, life science, and the “mind sciences” would improve human lives and in turn lead to world peace. To achieve his vision, Slick created three nonprofit research institutes – in 1941 the organization which would become the Texas Biomedical Research Institute; in 1947 the Southwest Research Institute; in 1958 the Mind Science Foundation – before he died in a plane crash in 1962 at the age of 46.
As a private foundation with a modest endowment, Mind Science has always sought to leverage its resources to pursue what Tom Slick called the “vast potential of the human mind”, using the scientific method. We believe the study of human consciousness that leads to improvements to the health and well-being of humankind, is the best way to honor his intent. We are committed to finding novel ways in which to do so.
We understand we can have the biggest impact on the field with a focus on contributing to the pipeline of researchers, beginning with high school students and on through early-career neuroscientists. We strongly believe providing opportunities for young scientists to fund their work, and hone their communications skills is critical to the advancement of science and a powerful counterweight to anti-science sentiment prevalent in some sectors.
About BrainStorm Neuroscience Pitch Competition
We have chosen the “pitch” model for research funding because of its audience participation format, which emphasizes the importance of the pitch presenter’s excellent communication of important scientific work to the lay audience, who then cast their votes for best pitch and the grand prize of $30,000. Finalists reaching the pitch competition are guaranteed $15,000 in funding.
The Competition has a specific focus on funding for early-career researchers teamed with senior primary investigators, working on pilot studies to help them obtain grants for further research, with an additional strategic goal designed to incentivize the building of skills in translating complex neuroscience for a general audience. We firmly believe that if a scientist can answer the “so what” question about their work, the layperson’s scientific literacy is increased, and they can make a direct connection between your basic research and the potential for solutions to come of some of the most intractable problems facing our species.
Because of the strategic goals for BrainStorm, proposals MUST include the participation of an early career scientist (e.g., graduate student, post-doc, etc.), who will be expected to present the research team’s pitch at the online BrainStorm event.
PLEASE NOTE: As the future of large gatherings is still uncertain, out of concern for the health and safety of participants and attendees, the live Competition event has now been moved to an ONLINE EVENT.
Mind Science has issued an open RFP for research proposals focused on original research, or the meaningful compilation and interpretation of existing research data, resulting in significant advancements in the science of consciousness and/or improvements in the health and well-being of humankind.
Fields of inquiry include, but are not limited to: neuroscience, cognitive science, psychology, resiliency, physics, philosophy, biology, artificial intelligence, sleep and dream research, creativity, education, neuro-ethics, and experiential/subjective studies.
Proposals MUST include the participation of an early career scientist (e.g., graduate student, post-doc, etc.), who will be expected to present the research team’s pitch at the online BrainStorm event.
In addition to funding important research, one of the unique goals for Mind Science and the BrainStorm Competition is to encourage and equip researchers to excel in translating their work for a general audience. If a scientist can answer the “so what” question about their work, the layperson’s scientific literacy is increased, and they can make a direct connection between your basic research and the potential for solutions to come of some of the most intractable problems facing our species.
Formal submissions are initially reviewed by the Mind Science Scientific Advisory Committee to determine scientific merit and fit for our funding priorities. Proposals advancing to the second round will be sent for formal peer review, and the research team will be asked to submit a short video presentation by the early-career member of your team that the Committee will evaluate to assess the presenter’s skills in verbally translating their work for a layperson. This video does not need to be highly produced, as the Committee will grade it on content and the ability to communicate your work to a lay audience – not the production value.
Proposals advancing to the final round of competition will receive feedback on their presentations and will be offered coaching resources in preparation for the live pitch competition, leading to the formal presentation of their project with a short (5-7 minutes, strictly enforced) talk, or “pitch” to our donors at the September 29, 2020 online BrainStorm event.
At the online BrainStorm event, each finalist will present a short talk (can include up to 7 slides) and the audience (made up of foundation donors and other members of the general public) will cast their votes following the presentations. Excellent, creative storytelling is key to getting voters engaged.
Each finalist will leave the Competition with at least $15,000, but the winning presenter will take the top prize of $30,000. If you are invited as a finalist, you are guaranteed a minimum of $15,000 in funding.
FORMAL PROPOSAL FORMAT
Investigators, Institution and Credentials
Names of the Principal Investigator(s) and Co-investigator(s), with institutional affiliation, contact info, CV for each investigator. (No Page Limit) In addition, in the event your proposal is chosen as a finalist, we will need a summary of your credentials including links for biographical websites, social media, awards won, and previous talks given to use in MSF communications (one paragraph).
Project Summary for the Lay Public
Mind Science has a philanthropic goal to increase the scientific literacy of the lay public and therefore requests a description of the proposed research that succinctly states the major aspects of the proposed project in a way that is understandable by a variety of audiences. In short, write your project summary as if you were explaining it to 8th graders. Avoid jargon. It should not exceed 2-3 concise paragraphs. In the event that the proposal makes it to the final round, this summary will be used in Mind Science communications. The description should explain your idea, the problem you are trying to solve, how it relates to consciousness and/or improvements to the health and well-being of humankind, your unique solution and how Mind Science funds will help you succeed in your goals. (1/2 page).
Six-page description of the proposed research, in accordance with the NIH formatting guidelines. This section should include: Specific Aims (1 page), Significance/Background (1 to 2 pages), Innovation (1/2 to 1 page), Approach (3 to 4 pages), Risk and Limitations (1/2 page), and Timeline (1/4 page).
In the event your proposal is chosen as a finalist, an IRB or equivalent institutional approval protocol for experiments involving human or animal subjects will be required.
Please indicate current IRB status:
• In place;
• Under review; or
• Still to be submitted to Institutional Review Board.
Please note: Funds will not be disbursed without an IRB or equivalent institutional approval protocol for experiments involving human or animal subjects. IRB’s should be submitted to email@example.com within 60 days of being notified of finalist status. (No Page Limit)
References should be listed in order of appearance. (No Page Limit)
Budget and Justification
The purpose of this section is to present and justify expenses required to achieve the project aims and objectives, and to indicate other significant ($50,000+) sources of funding. The budget is $15,000, scaleable to $30,000. Also, include what you add to your project to make it more robust if you had an extra $15,000. (No Page Limit)
Statement of deliverable product (i.e. publishable article, data as the basis for a publishable book, pilot data for subsequent funding by NIH, NIMH, or similar funding entities, etc.). (No Page Limit)
Awards will be made after peer review and review by the Mind Science Scientific Advisory Committee. Quality, originality, and relevance to the advancement of the science of consciousness and/or improvement of the health and well-being of humankind will be key factors in the evaluation process. It is important to note that proposals will be reviewed by both scientific and non-scientific professionals. Awards will be reviewed free of bias. Each section of the proposal will be scored based on the NIH scoring system. All proposals and results of peer and science committee review will be kept confidential. The content of your presentation at the final event, however, will be recorded and presented online.
Use of Funds and Restrictions
Research funds are restricted to actual costs, with no more than 5% indirect costs. Actual costs may include salaries for staff/assistants and salary supplements for Co-Investigators. Under special circumstances related to the goals of the research, salary supplement for Principal Investigators may also be appropriate.
Completed proposals should be transmitted electronically in PDF format by 11:59 pm CST on Wednesday, May 6, 2020 to: Mindy Cohen, Program and Communications Director (firstname.lastname@example.org). For further information, don’t hesitate to reach out either by email or phone (210-821-6094). Please note: all deadlines are firm, and proposals must be completed and submitted in full, in accordance with the RFP, with all sections addressed, and in the order they are listed on the RFP.
Checklist of proposal sections, in order
Investigators, Institution and Credentials (No Page Limit)
Project Summary for the Lay Public (1/2 page)
Research Strategy (6 pages total)
Specific Aims (1 page)
Significance/Background (1 to 2 pages)
Innovation (1/2 to 1 page)
Approach (3 to 4 pages)
Risk and Limitations (1/2 page)
Timeline (1/4 page)
IRB Protocol (No page limit)
References (No Page Limit)
Budget and Justification (No Page Limit)
Deliverable Product (No Page Limit)
Submission and Awards Calendar
RFP issued – March 6, 2020
Submission Deadline – May 6, 2020 (due Wednesday at 11:59 pm CST)
Video Round Finalists Notified – May 22, 2020
Peer Review – June and July 2020
Video submission deadline – July 29, 2020 (due Wednesday at 11:59 pm CST)
Three Finalists Notified – August 21, 2020
Presentation Practice and Coaching – September 2020
BrainStorm Neuroscience Pitch Competition Online Event – September 29, 2020
IMPORTANT NOTES/HELPFUL HINTS
Researchers will submit a formal proposal as detailed above with a budget of $15,000, scaleable to $30,000.
It is understood that the early career research member of your team will present at the final online event on September 29, 2020.
Speakers’ presentations will be recorded and posted on our social media platforms. Please take care when deciding what pieces of your story you want to share if you have proprietary information.
Speakers may not have a commercial agenda. Your project could result in a product to be developed but we don’t want solely product pitches. No political or religious agenda.
Speakers cannot read their talks. You can have slides to supplement but no more than 7, containing primarily pictures, easily understood graphics or video and judicious use of text.
Focus more time and energy on delivery, telling your story, and engaging the audience. Avoid jargon and data-heavy slides. Whereas the Mind Science Scientific Advisory Committee will determine the three finalists, audience votes will determine the winner of the additional $15,000 (for a total award of $30,000).
Use emotion to drive your story. A little humor goes a long way. Tell a story (surprising, funny, or a unique anecdote) personalizing your journey.
Visit our news section to learn about past recipients.